****JavaScript based drop down DHTML menu generated by NavStudio. (OpenCube Inc. - http://www.opencube.com)****
|
Page 4 |
Editorial |
|
Page 8 |
Albert A. Nofi's Knapsack |
Al Nofi's Knapsack is a regular column in North & South
that features vignettes and other reminiscences of the late
War Between the States. In this issue, the stories include
Henry Heth "sharing" flag carrying duties with the color bearer
of the 28th North Carolina at Reams' Station, William T. Sherman's
culinary abilities, one of John B. Magruder's legendary drinking
binges, Ulysses S. Grant's early lesson on fear, and the 1863
visit of several Russian fleets to United States waters.
|
Page 12 |
"A Most Horrible National
Sin": The Treatment of Prisoners in the American Civil War by Charles
W. Sanders Jr. |
Sanders looks at the overcrowding,
underfeeding, massive outbreaks of disease, and the other horrors of
Civil War prison camps. He leads off the article by giving a
brief history of prisoner exchange, how it broke down, and how this led
to the horrors prisoners experienced during the war. At this
point, the article takes a look at Civil War memory by both sides, and
the rationalization of many when it came to the deplorable conditions
in these prison camps. The author starts with a look at Southern
prisons, specifically countering six main "points" the Confederacy
offered as to why they were not responsible for the conditions in their
prisons. The Southern Historical Society produced two articles
edited by Reverend J. William Jones which set forth these points in
detail. Sanders states each point and attempts to debunk each one
after looking over the facts. The North never offered a
concentrated defense of their prisons as Jones, the SHS, and the former
Confederacy did, but the author takes a look at Report No. 45 from the
U.S. House of Representatives four years after the war. He
believes "the official federal position on the treatment of prisoners
was clearly stated" in this report. The document stated that the
North had done nothing wrong in their treatment of prisoners during the
war. Sanders maintains that historians mostly sided with the
House's findings, but he feels that the Confederate accounts of
Southerners being mistreated in Northern prisoners is closer to the
truth. Secretary of War Edwin Stanton is identified as the main
culprit. As the prisoner exchange broke down and reports of the
poor conditions in Confederate prisons trickled in, Stanton and his
Commissary General of Prisoners William Hoffmann systematically reduced
the supplies and care given to the Confederate prisoners. Stanton
reasoned that he would only do as much for the prisoners as the
Confederates were doing for Union soldiers. He also lays much of
the blame on Abraham Lincoln, saying that the President knew of
Stanton's reductions in food, shelter, and clothing, but did nothing to
stop them and never instituted measures to improve conditions. On
both sides, then, the treatment of prisoners was seriously lacking, a
fact the author calls "a most horrible national sin." The quote
is taken from a letter a Southern woman wrote Jefferson Davis about the
terrible conditions in the local Confederate prison.
|
Page 32 |
"Let No Man Prate of Compromise":
Anna Dickinson, Abraham Lincoln, and the Civil War by J. Matthew Gallman |
To Civil War Americans, the most
famous Dickinson was not Emily the poet, but instead Anna, an "American
Joan of Arc." Anna Dickinson, a Quaker and an abolitionist, was
not even 20 years old at the start of the Civil War. Her growing
fame lay in her excellent speaking ability. Starting in the
Philadelphia area, she gradually gained the support of prominent
Abolitionists who scheduled new speaking engagements around the
North. Dickinson spent most of the war disagreeing with some of
Abraham Lincoln's positions, especially his potential leniency toward
the South after the war. Dickinson was a prominent speaker for
the Republicans, and she campaigned for many members of the
party. She stopped short of backing Abraham Lincoln for
reelection, however. Instead, she chose to speak out against
Democratic nominee George McClellan. Dickinson was somewhat of a
unique individual in a time and place that prevented most women from
ever being in the public eye. She lived to be almost 90 in the
post war years, but fell out of the public eye with only a few
exceptions after the war.
|
Page
42 |
Civil
War Round Tables |
|
Page
44 |
Repeating
Rifles: A Weapons System Seeking a Tactical Role by Joseph G. Bilby |
Joe Bilby, author
of A
Revolution in Arms: A History of the First Repeating Rifles,
focuses on the new tactical roles employed by units wielding these new
weapons during the Civil War. By 1861 the Colt Revolving Rifle was
obsolete because it was still loaded in the old way a conventional musket
would be. New breechloaders such as the Spencer repeating rifle,
Spencer repeating carbine and the Henry repeating rifle led to increased
firepower and new tactical doctrines. Bilby relates the somewhat
uneven and wholly informal methods used to create these doctrines.
It was apparent from the start that these weapons were very effective
on the defensive. Armed with repeaters, units such as Wilder's Lightning
Brigade and later many cavalry regiments in the Army of the Potomac were
worth far more than an equal number of men using muzzle loaders.
As the war progressed, men such as George Custer slowly but surely learned
how to use the weapons in an offensive role, either leading a charge or
providing covering fire to keep the defenders' heads down. By the
Petersburg Campaign, Union divisions were even starting to create informal
sharpshooter units armed exclusively with Spencers and special sharpshooting
target rifles. A main concern with the rapid firing weapons was
ammunition conservation. Many opponents said these units would very
quickly expend any ammo they could carry with them. Methods were
put in place to prevent this from happening, and were largely successful
by the end of the war. After the Civil War ended, lever action repeating
rifles were quickly phased out, says the author, due to "failure
to meet the postwar needs in a rapidly changing military small arms scene."
|
Page
55 |
Cover
Story |
|
Page 56 |
Brother Against Brother (and Sister):
Stories From the Civil War's Divided Houses by Amy Murrell Taylor |
Amy M. Taylor looks at examples of divided families
during the war, probing into their rationalization of this division and
how the families reunited after the conflict. The author uses many
prominent families as examples, including the Clays of Kentucky, Mary
Todd Lincoln and her Confederate half-siblings, and even the father and
mother of future President Theodore Roosevelt. Taylor believes families
rationalized their divisions by using typical reasons for family angst:
brotherly competition, a son's inclination to rebel against his father's
authority, a father-in-law's influence over one's wife, etc. Families
used these reasons, says Taylor, in place of political ones. Interestingly,
in her study of border state families, the author found that three-fourths
of the fathers we slave holders, but many remained in the Union while
sons left for the Confederate armies. When brothers faced each other
in battle, it opened up the question of how to remain loyal to your side
in the conflict and your family at the same time. Taylor says the
nation believed that brothers should treat one another as enemies in the
heat of battle, but work to ensure their siblings' well-being at all other
times. After the war, many families struggled to reconcile, with
monetary gifts being a popular first form of regaining contact.
Emotional bonds, says Taylor, were much harder to regain. Ultimately,
the nation came to view itself as a divided family, ready to forget the
past and come together once more. This "reconciliationist"
(as David Blight puts it, says the author) policy ultimately led the white
portion of the population to sweep slavery under the rug in favor of becoming
one nation again.
|
Page 66 |
Best Of...Civil War Richmond
by Don Pierce |
This issue's "Best Of..." focuses
on the sights of the Confederate capital, Richmond, Virginia. Important
points include the Museum of the Confederacy, the Tredigar Iron Works,
the Virginia State capitol, the Richmond National Battlefield Park's Visitors
Center, Monument Avenue, Hollywood Cemetery, the Civil War Medical Museum,
and of course the numerous battlefields.
|
Page 70 |
Lincoln, Davis, and the Dahlgren Raid by David E. Long
|
The Dahlgren Raid has always been controversial.
Papers were found on the body of young Colonel Ulric Dahlgren after he
had been shot and killed on the expedition. These papers authorized
him to capture or assassinate Confederate President Jefferson Davis.
Some believe Lincoln's assassination was a direct response to this affair.
But who gave Dahlgren those orders? David E. Long believes that
the evidence conclusively points to none other than President Lincoln
himself, and sets out to convince readers of this version of events in
the article. His main focus early on is the extremely close relationship
between Lincoln and Ulric Dahlgren's father, Rear Admiral John Dahlgren.
Then the author moves on to specific meetings and covers the various aspects
of what actually happened between Frebruary 28 and March 3, 1864.
He also is quick to mention that although the raid is most commonly referred
to as the Kilpatrick-Dahlgren Raid, he believes Kilpatrick and his large
force were meant to deceive the public and posterity as to who was really
blame for the assassination attempt. Cavalry author and future Ulric
Dahlgren biographer Eric Wittenberg posted
some interesting comments on this article on his blog.
|
Page 84 |
Briefings |
Books reviewed in this issue:
1. Banners
South: A Northern Community at War by Edmund J. Raus, Jr.
2. The
Atlantic Slave Trade by Johannes Postma
3. Complicity:
How the North Promoted, Prolonged, and Profited from Slavery
by Anne Farrow, Joel Lang, and Jenifer Frank
4. Incidents
of the War: The Civil War Journal of Mary Jane Chadick edited
and annotated by Nancy M. Rohr
5. South
Carolina Scalawags by Hyman J. Rubin, III
6. Contested
Borderland: The Civil War in Appalachian Kentucky and Virginia
by Brian D. McKnight
7. Dixie
Betrayed: How the South Really Lost the Civil War by David J.
Eicher
8. Prophets
of Protest: Reconsidering the History of American Abolitionism
edited by Timothy Patrick McCarthy and John Stauffer
9. Slavery
and the Peculiar Solution: A History of the American Colonization
Society by Eric Burin
10. A
Maryland Bride in the Deep South: The Civil War Diary of Priscilla Bond
edited by Kimberly Harrison
11. Shock
Troops of the Confederacy: The Sharpshooter Battalions of the Army of
Northern Virginia by Fred L. Ray
12. The
Devil's Own Work: The Civil War Draft Riots and the Fight to
Reconstruct America by Barnet Schecter
|
|
|